Fit before effort
A score against a funder's criteria or an investor's thesis, with what matches and what is missing.
Grants, accelerators, investors, lenders. xta keeps everything your organisation knows in one living context, drafts every answer from it with sources, and learns from each one you approve.
Free to start. No card needed.
Max 150 words
1,240 home cooks sell through LetsChop today, and 81% of them are women running kitchens from home in Lagos. Every cook passes a kitchen inspection before their first order. On the demand side, 31,800 orders a month come from households that want safe, affordable home-cooked food. Repeat customers make up needs: repeat-order rate of monthly orders.
Most of the work in a funding application is retelling your story, in a different shape for every grant panel, accelerator and lender. xta keeps the story so your team can spend its time on the parts only you can write.
Paste your about page, deck notes or last application. xta sorts it into a company profile, products and the stories you tell funders.
Add a grant call, accelerator or loan by link. xta scores your fit against its criteria and shows what is missing before you spend a week on it.
Every answer is written from your context, inside the word limit, with the sources it used. Missing facts are flagged, never invented.
Reviewers approve or send back. Approved answers go to a memory inbox, and what you keep makes the next application stronger.
General facts live at the top, specifics below. When layers disagree, the more specific one wins and the rest stays as background. Nothing you have told xta gets lost.
A score against a funder's criteria or an investor's thesis, with what matches and what is missing.
When a fact is missing, the draft says so. You fill it once and it is remembered.
Each draft lists the context it drew on, so reviewers check facts instead of hunting for them.
Send an application for review, comment on any answer, approve or send it back. Everyone sees the same version.
Lead with the 81% figure. It is our strongest line for this funder.
Approved answers wait in an inbox. Keep what is true, edit what needs it, and it becomes part of your context.
Founders own the story, product leads keep it current, applicants draft, reviewers sign off.
Funding applications carry financials, traction and plans you would not put on a website. xta is built on the assumption that every byte of it is sensitive.
Every query is scoped to your workspace on the server. Nothing crosses to another tenant.
Seven roles, checked on every request, not just hidden buttons in the interface.
Nothing enters your context without a human approving it from the memory inbox.
Short-lived tokens in httpOnly cookies, rotated on refresh, with reuse detection.
Every plan includes the full context stack. Upgrade or downgrade any time.
Get your story straight before you spend a cent.
For the founder writing applications at night.
For teams with a funding pipeline to run.
For organisations applying everywhere, all year.
White-label, self-hosting with a bridge to central intelligence, SSO and unlimited seats.
A workspace where your organisation keeps what it knows about itself: mission, products, the angles you pitch to different funders, and a dated timeline of what has happened. xta drafts your funding applications from that context, whether it is a grant, an accelerator, an investor’s form or a loan, and learns from the answers you approve.
No. Track grants, prizes, fellowships, accelerators, equity rounds, crowdfunding and loans side by side, each marked dilutive or non-dilutive with its terms and any equity taken. Drafts are written for the reader: impact and programme fit for grant reviewers, traction and use of funds for investors, revenue and repayment for lenders.
It drafts only from your context and shows the sources behind every answer. When it needs a fact you have not given it, it leaves a visible marker such as “needs: 2025 revenue” for you to fill, instead of inventing a number. For investors it never rounds numbers up, and it labels projections as forward-looking.
Founders, nonprofits and the people who write their funding applications: anyone applying to more than a handful of funders, programmes or investors a year and tired of rewriting the same story from scratch each time.
Yes. Invite people as admins, product owners, applicants, reviewers or read-only members. Permissions are enforced on the server, and reviewers approve or send back answers before anything is submitted.
Yes. One sign-in, many workspaces. Switch between them from the workspace menu, or create a new one in a few seconds.
No. Your context stays inside your workspace and every query is scoped to it. Any cross-organisation insight we add later will be opt-in and anonymised.
It lands in your memory inbox. You decide what to keep and where it belongs: company, product or storyline. What you keep is used in every application after that.
Set up your workspace in ten minutes. Your first drafted answer is a few clicks after that.
Joining a team already on xta? Ask an admin for an invite.